ReadMe 1

Abstract: Beginning study for the online course in introductory philosophy is outlined and discussed

Welcome to the Course!

A good way to begin the course is as follows: …

study the HTML Syllabus or print out and study the PDF Syllabus and generally become familiar with the course requirements. In a nutshell, your course grade is based on three tests and your posts to the Philosophy Forum message board.
I recommend printing out the PDF Syllabus even though it is about thirty pages in length. The syllabus contains very thorough information with respect to class policies, requirements, and instructions and contains detailed information about how to do well on tests. Test instructions should be reviewed before every test submission.
study the Assignment Schedule and become familiar with the important due dates for the three tests and the weekly due dates for posting comments to the Philosophy Forum.
read the first chapter Personal Uses of Philosophy in the online textbook. The textbook for the course is not sold in the bookstore. For local students, there are copies available at the Larry A. Lander Library for checkout for various time periods. If you are a distance education student, you can checkout a copy through inter-library loan.

(When reading online, be sure to re-size the window of your Internet browser so that the text is only about 65 to 70 letters across the screen. Also, if necessary, increase the font size to 10-12 by selecting the “View” drop-down menu just above the address bar of your browser. Studies show reading speed and comprehension is most effective at about that line width.) If you do not easily adapt to reading online, I will recommend printing out specific chapters of the textbook as the semester progresses. I do not recommend printing the first week's textbook reading assignments,
read The Nature of Learning in the online textbook, and the remaining assignments for the first week on the Assignment Schedule
Register and post your comments on the reading assignments to the Discussion part of Philosophy Forum in accordance with the class schedule. For instructions on how to register for the Philosophy Forum see the Syllabus.

Your first week is probably the busiest week. Do not be overly concerned about a slow start. Many students are new to an online course, and to read the syllabus and sign up for the Philosophy Forum message board might take more than a few days. The most efficient way to proceed is to concentrate on one thing at a time and not try to do all things at once. Hopefully, by the end of the first full week of classes everyone will have figured out how to register for the message board, how to post a message, and how to locate the readings assignments for the course.

Important! This online philosophy course is not for everyone. The course assumes that you are able to work independently and schedule time daily for reading and study. Your Web course puts a substantial burden on you to take charge of your own learning. Before continuing with this course carefully consider whether or not you are the kind of pro-active student who can motivate yourself to take charge of your own learning and who can follow written instructions carefully. You must be able to allocate at least the mininum amount of study time suggested in the syllabus for this course.

Students who study daily often do well; students who study only on weekends, or study only just before tests, cannot hope to succeed in this course. Grades in previous WebCT introductory philosophy classes have proved to be “bi-modal”: about 25% are As, 20% Bs, 15% Cs, 20% D's, and 20% Fs. About half of the Fs in previous courses are due to students thinking that take-home tests can be done by simply paraphrasing online notes. The other half of the Fs occur because of academic dishonesty. In this day and age, there are an amazing variety of ways to verifiy academic honesty which range from statistical tests, file metadata,to dedicated commercial programs—all of which are routinely applied by your instructor.

I realize that most students cannot fathom how copying True/False and Multiple Choice questions can be known through statistical tests. If you are interested, see the Online FAQ question 16 for this course explaining how it is done.

I think objective questions are an important part of assessment, and if academic honesty could not be checked, I would not use this method of testing for an open-book test. (Even so, I strongly recommend that if you are a student who doubts the efficacy of the software that you do your own research on the question.)

The key to doing well in philosophy is to keep up with course content on a daily basis.

The main reason some persons do not do well in this course is, I think, due to

(1) misunderstanding how to approach the "open book" and "open notes" tests

(2) forgetting to post comments on the readings to the mwforum Message Board, and

(3) being unaware of how evident online paraphrasing of another person's work shows up in student work.

Many persons believe that it is sufficient to briefly paraphrase the online notes and related Internet sources immediately prior to the due date of the tests. The lack of understanding of what is read and written in such cases is evident from inavdertent inconsistencies, vague language, a rush to meet a deadline, and poor or inappropriate examples thought up "on the fly." What I am looking for with respect to your essays on tests is your own reconstruction and explanation of the key ideas and philosophies.

Anyone can do well in this course if he or she approaches the course in the same way as one approaches playing a sport, playing music, or learning a language. Just as it is difficult to "cram" the night before a soccer game, a tennis match, or a recital so it is likewise difficult to do well in philosophy by trying to do too much at one time.

If you think about it, one cannot “cram” for something normally learned through intermittent and extensive practice. But, of course, through frequent practice, difficult activities transform into more easily and naturally mastered activities.

If you have any trouble beginning these items listed above, email me at larchie at philosophy.lander.edu (convert the "at" to the "@" symbol in the address) and I'll be glad to help you get started. I look forward to an exciting and fascinating semester and hope you do so as well.

Further Recommended Reading:

Notes on How to Study: Very brief notes on effective methods of study—a refresher summary of useful techniques.
The Internet Philosopher is a tutorial on the use of the Internet for studying philosophy. The tutorial covers the prominent Internet sites, how to search, what to trust, and how to maximize information skills. Other features include printer friendly pages, glossary, and a link basket, teaching resources, workbook, slide presentation, handouts, and downloadable poster. The site is authored by Stig Hansen at the University of Leeds and is a tutorial designed for UK higher education by the RDN Virtual Training Suite. For students of philosophy, the Internet Philosopher is most helpful at the beginning of the semester since the visitor quickly learns how to access some of the most useful and authoritative sites on the Internet.
Study Guides and Strategies: An important and useful site for how to study for different types of courses is developed and maintained by Joseph Landsberger. Sections of this site include recommendations for preparing, learning, studying, writing, classroom participation, projects. tests, and research—well worth a visit to peruse or browse.
Philosophy Forums is one of the very best sites for discussion of philosophical topics in all areas of philosophy. For this course, reading the "Intro to Philosophy" and the "General Philosophy" forums are especially recommended. Other forums include topics for metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, logic, mathematics, religion, language, science, politics, law, social sciences, arts, and debates on philosophical issues. Posting requires registration.

"Philosophy is knowledge of the Universe, or of everything there is, but when we set forth on its quest, we know neither what there is, nor if what there is forms a Universe or a Multi-verse, nor whether Universe or Multi-verse will be knowable." José Ortega y Gasset, What Is Philosophy?, trans. Mildred Adams (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1964), 90.

	ReadMe 1 Introductory Notes
text \| sound \| contrast \| print
Nature of Philosophy Divisions of Philosophy Characteristics of a Philosophical Problem Principle of Charity Philosophy of Life Socratic Philosophy I Socratic Philosophy II Russell's Value of Philosophy Tolstoy's Faith Camus's Nobility of Soul James on the Significant Life Philosophy of Religion Introduction to Phil. of Religion Anselm's Ontological Argument Kant's Existence is Not a Predicate Thomas Aquinas's Five Ways --Motion --Cause --Necessary Being --Gradation --Design Paley's Teleological Argument Hume's Design Argument: A Critique Pascal's Wager Kierkegaard's Can God's Existence Be Proved? Dostoevsky's The Problem of Evil Hick's Evil Can Be Allowed Kierkegaard's Truth as Subjectivity Philosophical Ethics Free Will and Determinism Spinoza's Human Beings are Determined James's The Will to Believe Plato's Myth of Gyges Egoism is Mistaken Westermark's Ethics are Relative Moore's Objectivity of Moral Judgments Aristotle's Life of Excellence Bentham's The Greatest Good Nietzsche's Slave and Master Morality Sartre's Existential Ethics Philosophy of Art Voltaire's Beauty is Relative Hume's Art Has Standards Pater's Art as Emotional Response Bell's Art as Significant Form Philosophy of Knowledge Comte's Positive Philosophy Feuerbach's Scientific Determinism Russell's Correspondence Theory Bradley's Coherence Theory James's Pragmatic Theory Aristotle's Future Truths
April 18 2024 18:49 EDT Carnell Learning Center Atrium Lander University SITE SEARCH ENGINE Loading Links for Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry Site Home Intro.Philosophy Home Campus Schedule Online Schedule Campus Syllabus Online Syllabus Textbook Sample Quizzes SampleTests On Campus FAQ Online FAQ Links since 01.01.06	Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry ReadMe 1 Abstract: Beginning study for the online course in introductory philosophy is outlined and discussed Welcome to the Course! A good way to begin the course is as follows: … study the HTML Syllabus or print out and study the PDF Syllabus and generally become familiar with the course requirements. In a nutshell, your course grade is based on three tests and your posts to the Philosophy Forum message board. I recommend printing out the PDF Syllabus even though it is about thirty pages in length. The syllabus contains very thorough information with respect to class policies, requirements, and instructions and contains detailed information about how to do well on tests. Test instructions should be reviewed before every test submission. study the Assignment Schedule and become familiar with the important due dates for the three tests and the weekly due dates for posting comments to the Philosophy Forum. read the first chapter Personal Uses of Philosophy in the online textbook. The textbook for the course is not sold in the bookstore. For local students, there are copies available at the Larry A. Lander Library for checkout for various time periods. If you are a distance education student, you can checkout a copy through inter-library loan. (When reading online, be sure to re-size the window of your Internet browser so that the text is only about 65 to 70 letters across the screen. Also, if necessary, increase the font size to 10-12 by selecting the “View” drop-down menu just above the address bar of your browser. Studies show reading speed and comprehension is most effective at about that line width.) If you do not easily adapt to reading online, I will recommend printing out specific chapters of the textbook as the semester progresses. I do not recommend printing the first week's textbook reading assignments, read The Nature of Learning in the online textbook, and the remaining assignments for the first week on the Assignment Schedule Register and post your comments on the reading assignments to the Discussion part of Philosophy Forum in accordance with the class schedule. For instructions on how to register for the Philosophy Forum see the Syllabus. Your first week is probably the busiest week. Do not be overly concerned about a slow start. Many students are new to an online course, and to read the syllabus and sign up for the Philosophy Forum message board might take more than a few days. The most efficient way to proceed is to concentrate on one thing at a time and not try to do all things at once. Hopefully, by the end of the first full week of classes everyone will have figured out how to register for the message board, how to post a message, and how to locate the readings assignments for the course. Important! This online philosophy course is not for everyone. The course assumes that you are able to work independently and schedule time daily for reading and study. Your Web course puts a substantial burden on you to take charge of your own learning. Before continuing with this course carefully consider whether or not you are the kind of pro-active student who can motivate yourself to take charge of your own learning and who can follow written instructions carefully. You must be able to allocate at least the mininum amount of study time suggested in the syllabus for this course. Students who study daily often do well; students who study only on weekends, or study only just before tests, cannot hope to succeed in this course. Grades in previous WebCT introductory philosophy classes have proved to be “bi-modal”: about 25% are As, 20% Bs, 15% Cs, 20% D's, and 20% Fs. About half of the Fs in previous courses are due to students thinking that take-home tests can be done by simply paraphrasing online notes. The other half of the Fs occur because of academic dishonesty. In this day and age, there are an amazing variety of ways to verifiy academic honesty which range from statistical tests, file metadata,to dedicated commercial programs—all of which are routinely applied by your instructor. I realize that most students cannot fathom how copying True/False and Multiple Choice questions can be known through statistical tests. If you are interested, see the Online FAQ question 16 for this course explaining how it is done. I think objective questions are an important part of assessment, and if academic honesty could not be checked, I would not use this method of testing for an open-book test. (Even so, I strongly recommend that if you are a student who doubts the efficacy of the software that you do your own research on the question.) The key to doing well in philosophy is to keep up with course content on a daily basis. The main reason some persons do not do well in this course is, I think, due to (1) misunderstanding how to approach the "open book" and "open notes" tests (2) forgetting to post comments on the readings to the mwforum Message Board, and (3) being unaware of how evident online paraphrasing of another person's work shows up in student work. Many persons believe that it is sufficient to briefly paraphrase the online notes and related Internet sources immediately prior to the due date of the tests. The lack of understanding of what is read and written in such cases is evident from inavdertent inconsistencies, vague language, a rush to meet a deadline, and poor or inappropriate examples thought up "on the fly." What I am looking for with respect to your essays on tests is your own reconstruction and explanation of the key ideas and philosophies. Anyone can do well in this course if he or she approaches the course in the same way as one approaches playing a sport, playing music, or learning a language. Just as it is difficult to "cram" the night before a soccer game, a tennis match, or a recital so it is likewise difficult to do well in philosophy by trying to do too much at one time. If you think about it, one cannot “cram” for something normally learned through intermittent and extensive practice. But, of course, through frequent practice, difficult activities transform into more easily and naturally mastered activities. If you have any trouble beginning these items listed above, email me at larchie at philosophy.lander.edu (convert the "at" to the "@" symbol in the address) and I'll be glad to help you get started. I look forward to an exciting and fascinating semester and hope you do so as well. Further Recommended Reading: Notes on How to Study: Very brief notes on effective methods of study—a refresher summary of useful techniques. The Internet Philosopher is a tutorial on the use of the Internet for studying philosophy. The tutorial covers the prominent Internet sites, how to search, what to trust, and how to maximize information skills. Other features include printer friendly pages, glossary, and a link basket, teaching resources, workbook, slide presentation, handouts, and downloadable poster. The site is authored by Stig Hansen at the University of Leeds and is a tutorial designed for UK higher education by the RDN Virtual Training Suite. For students of philosophy, the Internet Philosopher is most helpful at the beginning of the semester since the visitor quickly learns how to access some of the most useful and authoritative sites on the Internet. Study Guides and Strategies: An important and useful site for how to study for different types of courses is developed and maintained by Joseph Landsberger. Sections of this site include recommendations for preparing, learning, studying, writing, classroom participation, projects. tests, and research—well worth a visit to peruse or browse. Philosophy Forums is one of the very best sites for discussion of philosophical topics in all areas of philosophy. For this course, reading the "Intro to Philosophy" and the "General Philosophy" forums are especially recommended. Other forums include topics for metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, logic, mathematics, religion, language, science, politics, law, social sciences, arts, and debates on philosophical issues. Posting requires registration. "Philosophy is knowledge of the Universe, or of everything there is, but when we set forth on its quest, we know neither what there is, nor if what there is forms a Universe or a Multi-verse, nor whether Universe or Multi-verse will be knowable." José Ortega y Gasset, What Is Philosophy?, trans. Mildred Adams (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1964), 90. [an error occurred while processing this directive] This page last updated 12/20/09 © 2006 Licensed under the GFDL

ReadMe 1

Introductory Notes

SITE SEARCH ENGINE

ReadMe 1